The Negatives Of Genetic Engineering

The term genic engineering wisdom was first coined by Jack Williamson in is science fiction novel Dragons Island, published in 1 951 ,virtuoso year in advance Donas role in heredity was confirmed by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, and two years before James Watson and Francis Crick showed that the DNA molecule has a double-helix structure, DNA stands for (desorbing cultic acid). For many years, there has been a line surrounding the morality of genetic modifying organisms.Some its un ethical since it whitethorn lead to side effects such as mutation, others say its totally delicious since it can induct a stronger healthier and smarter organism. I tryingly believe that genetic engineering should be banned for multiple reasons such as religion, morals, physical attri alonees and crossing species boundaries. In every country there is different religions and these religions have different views. One of these views argon on genetic engineering, whether it is acceptable or non m odifying genes.God created us gentleman not perfective aspect so why do we unavoidableness to reach saint when it is not a human trait. Other people who lack faith entrust tell you humans seek perfection its in their nature so its k modifying genes, but if we reached perfection what do we have to seek, we loud be perfect and lose our touch of humanity. Is genetic engineering ethical to do, children who are made with specific genes are produced for one and only(a) specific reason and it is to help another person medically in other words they are made for being spare for the specific person.In my sisters custodian a book close a fille who was a genetically modified to help her dying sister from cancer for 12 years she was utilize as a spare for her sister and when they cherished to take a kidney, she took matter in her protest hands and sued her parents for emancipation. So it is not moral or right to bring a person dear to be spare. Although other people will contrave ne and say that by doing so they are thrift lives, but they don t think of the lives they are destroying .Gene modifying is not a 100% accurate, it has many mishaps one of the mishaps is a chronic disease which happened in 2001 at a reproductive facility in unseasoned jersey were thirty babies who are genetically modified and have genes of three different people, two women and a man some of these thirty children had turners syndrome and turners syndrome happens to one in very 2500 baby and in thirty babies it occurred more than twice is alarming. There people contradict that genetic modification has many benefits, like it increases polymorphism but what about mutations that occur in the children that born. Are they hypothetical to live with disabilities because some scientists wanted to play god. What about modifying genes to create a new species, are we bushel to see a new type of species walk around with us, scientists are talking about a new kind of humans that have the out er(a) look of humans and the abilities of animals, do we want a human tiger that may be ravening and be a hazard to other convention humans?